Posts Tagged ‘Obama’

U.S. News: Obama Plagiarized His State of the Union Speech

Posted on: January 26th, 2011

 

 

Cartoon by Antonio Branco -- "ComicallyIncorrect.com"

Takes Lines from JFK, Eisenhower, FDR, Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher

By Jane Jamison

Hat tip: “The Great One” — Mark Levin

It is astounding that this is not getting more news media coverage:  Barack Obama and/or his speechwriters plagiarized his State of the Union address. Not even a LITTLE bit, but every significant statement is  a “cut and paste” job.

U.S. News’ Alvin Felzenberg  has analyzed segments of the state of the union  speech and lines them up with speeches of John F. Kennedy, Margaret Thatcher, two stupid,non-workable ideas from Jimmy Carter (“green jobs” and “zero-based” budgeting) Franklin Delano Roosevelt, Ronald Reagan and Dwight Eisenhower.  The “Sputnik” moment also is not Obama’s original thought. [Read Robert Schlesinger: Obama Not the First to Use 'Sputnik Moment.']

Former British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher

If this was a college term paper, Obama would get an “F” and and a suspension from many university programs which have rules against stealing material without attribution.   At Harvard University, where Obama once attended,  the penalty for plagiarism is to be withdrawn from the course, possibly refused entry into other courses and to lose all tuition paid for the class. At Rutgers University, plagiarism is considered an offense against the university, requiring a university review, and grounds for expulsion.

It is shocking how MUCH of the speech is not original, yet it should not be surprising. 

The mainstream media ignored the “true story” of the speech the president gave in Tucson at the funeral service for the shooting victims.  There was so much gushing over the delivery and phrasing that no one much wanted to acknowledge that Obama didn’t write the speech.

When pressed on the matter, Obama press advisor Robert Gibbs finally admitted that the president had written “very much” of the much-lauded (by liberals or if you like pep rallies for funerals) Tucson speech, when in fact it was written by a young Chicago writer on the president’s staff, named Cody Keenan.

There is a long history of Obama taking credit for what is not his: Author/investigator Jack Cashill has done an expose on Obama’s book, “Dreams from my Father” and concludes it was written by Obama friend William Ayers (who used to be a Student Liberation Army bomber/terrorist.  But I digress.)

Is it any wonder that Obama has steadfastly refused to release his college records and term papers?  

Read Felzenberg’s analysis of the President’s speech plagiarism here at U.S. News.

Felzenberg’s conclusion:

It would appear that the only president of note whose imprint was absent in Obama’s long awaited and much-anticipated speech was Obama. This was supposed to have been the moment when the nation found out whether he was at the core a Rooseveltian liberal of a Clintonian centrist. What it got was a cut and pasted version of great and not-so-great State of the Union and other addresses of the past.

Sometime last year, many suggested that Obama would have an easier time getting his message across if he was less dependent on his teleprompter. This may be the year his writers are advised to throw away their books of political quotations. Then we may finally find out what the president truly believes and what he hopes to achieve in the office he so ardently sought.”

Friend Now Says: “There is xxx noxxxx or isxxxx Obama Birth Certificate” in Hawaii (!!?)

Posted on: January 26th, 2011

UPDATE:  1-26-11     Cindy Simpson for American Thinker says conservatives should be very wary of this latest kerfuffle from Abercrombie…that it all may be a “trial balloon” to see if the issue has legs for 2012.   That could be……

UPDATE:   1-26-11    Apparently, Mr. Evans has had a “chat” with his “friend” Neil Abercrombie……and now is walking back all that he said about talking to Neil and there is no birth certificate in Hawaii….now Mikey says he hasn’t talked to Neil since the governor’s election and doesn’t know anything about birth certificates or not or something………   Shall we hazard a wild guess what has just happened ??   Read it here.    Like I say, this story makes me “tired.”  It interests me that the aging hippie Neil A. has been so interested in “helping” to clear the air about the birth cert., but has ended up making things more worrisome.   Rush Limbaugh thinks this is some sort of Obama “rope-a-dope” trial balloon to see how this issue will  or will not be a problem for 2012.    All I can say about that is, the 2012 election will NOT be won or lost on the basis of citizenship.  It will be something else.

UPDATE:   1-24-11  Joseph Farah of World Net Daily,  long-timer “birth certificate” rabble-rouser, thinks the so-called “birthers” have suddenly become more mainstream due to the activities of the Democratic Hawaiian governor.   Talk show hosts like Rush Limbaugh,  and conservative website publisher Matthew Drudge have been carrying stories about Abercrombie’s bumblings in behalf of the president, which has raised the public awareness of the issue.  Now that a Democrat who claims to be a friend of the president can’t find the documentation….well……..there’s a problem, isn’t there?    My how things can change QUICKLY…… 

The Hawaii governor who keeps trying to HELP Barack Obama, by trying to prove there is a Hawaii birth certificate showing American citizenship, keeps muddying the waters.   In fact, it probably would have been MUCH BETTER if Gov. Neil Abercrombie had said nothing.  

Here’s the latest puzzlement:

Mike Evans, Hollywood reporter

Per American Thinker Monday, author Jack Cashill shares a radio station interview done in Hawaii over the weekend.  A friend of the governor of Hawaii, Hollywood reporter, Mike Evans.

Evans (who sounds like he has no axe to grind, listen for yourself) says Abercrombie has told him he has searched all the Hawaiian archives and there is no birth certificate on file showing Barack Obama was born there.

As you recall, Neil Abercrombie, a Democrat just elected as Hawaii governor, promised he would put the birth certificate issue “to rest” “for once and for all” as governor, because he didn’t want it to become an issue for 2012. [ see my two background stories linked below.]

Instead of solving the mystery, Abercrombie has made things sooooooo much worse.  After conducting a search, Abercrombie has said publicly, “there was something in writing in the files, but not a certificate.”  But he won’t produce anything for us to see.

Now this “friend” of the governor’s says…..indeed….there is NOTHING in the files.  NOTHING.

Mike Evans - “...Neil promised me when he became governor he would cut through all the red tape…end this stupid controversy… He searched everywhere using his powers as governor at the Kapiolani Woman’s and Children’s hospital and Queens hospital. There is no Barack Obama birth certificate in Hawaii, absolutely no proof at all that he was born in Hawaii….”

Hawaii Governor Neil Abercrombie

KQRS

Uh oh.

Previously on UNCOVERAGE.net:

5 Reasons Why the State of the Union Address was Completely Wrong on the Economy

Posted on: January 26th, 2011

Also:  ABC News Fact-checker on the speech

The Economic Collapse Blog:

Empty Promises: 5 Reasons Why Barack Obama’s State Of The Union Address Was Completely Wrong About The Economy

By Michael Snyder:

Barack Obama’s State of the Union address sure sounded good, didn’t it?  There were lots of solemn promises, lots of stuff about America’s “bright future” and a line about how we are now facing this generation’s “Sputnik moment” that will surely make headlines all over the globe.  But we all knew that Barack Obama could give a good speech.  That has never been the issue.  What the American people really need are some very real answers to some very real problems.  So were there any real answers in Barack Obama’s State of the Union address?  Well, Barack Obama promised that America will “out-innovate, out-educate and out-build” the rest of the world.  He also pledged that America will become “the best place in the world to do business” and that the government must “take responsibility” for our deficit spending.  But does all of this rhetoric mean anything or is all this just another batch of empty promises to add to the long list of empty promises that Barack Obama has already made and broken?

The American people certainly don’t need any more empty promises.  Millions of American families have been pushed to the edge of desperation by this economy.

There has been a lot of talk that the economy is “turning around”, but in many areas of the country the employment situation continues to get even worse.  Payrolls decreased in 35 U.S. states during the month of December.

The truth is that the number of “good jobs” produced by the U.S. economy continues to shrink.  In fact, only 47 percent of working-age Americans have a full-time job at this point.

The American people are not going to buy this “economic recovery” as long as unemployment remains at epidemic levels in so many areas.  Just consider some of the stunningly high unemployment rates in some of our most important states….

Nevada – 14.5%

California – 12.5%

Florida – 12.0%

So did Barack Obama propose anything substantial that will actually create real jobs?

No.

Instead, all he had to offer was just a bunch of empty promises.  It is almost as if Obama believes that a really good inspirational speech will somehow make things better.  The following are just a few of the empty promises Obama made during his address to the nation….

Empty Promise #1: America Will “Out-Innovate” The Rest Of The World And This Will Create More Jobs

During the State of the Union address, Barack Obama promised that the United States will “out-innovate” the rest of the world and that this will create more jobs.

Oh really?

Perhaps we could create some more cutting edge products like the Apple iPhone, right?

After all, Apple iPhones were one of the most wildly successful American technological innovations of the past decade.  Surely this is the kind of innovation that Obama would like to see more of.

Well, do you know where Apple iPhones are made?

Apple iPhones are manufactured in China by workers making about 293 dollars a month (and that was after a big raise).

But it isn’t just the Apple iPhone that is made overseas.  The truth is that almost all high technology products are made outside of the United States.

In 2008, 1.2 billion cellphones were sold worldwide.  So how many of them were manufactured inside the United States?  Zero.

Ouch.

Not only that, another fact to note is that manufacturing employment in the U.S. computer industry was actually lower in 2010 than it was in 1975.

So exactly how is more “innovation” going to produce millions of U.S. jobs if all of the high tech manufacturing continues to be shipped out of the United States?

Empty Promise #2: America Will “Out-Educate” The Rest Of The World And This Will Create More Jobs

For decades, U.S. presidents have promised that “education” is the key to competing with the rest of the world.

Okay, if suddenly every single person in the United States had an extra college degree, would that mean that more jobs would suddenly start popping into existence?

Of course not.

Right now, we can’t produce enough nearly enough jobs for all of the college graduates that we already have.

Sadly, the truth is that we are already experiencing an epidemic of unemployment among our college graduates.  According to the Project on Student Debt, unemployment for new college graduates stood at 8.7 percent in 2009, which was way up from 5.8 percent in 2008.

But that is not the whole story.

Millions of college graduates that have been able to find jobs have ended up taking jobs that they didn’t even need a college education for.  The “underemployment rate” among college graduates is absolutely exploding.

In 1992, there were just 5.1 million “underemployed” college graduates in the United States, but by 2008 there were 17 million “underemployed” college graduates in the United States.

Many of our brightest young minds are now flipping burgers, waiting tables and welcoming people to Wal-Mart.

In fact, in the United States today 317,000 waiters and waitresses have college degrees.

Oh, but certainly the answer is to get more Americans to go to college, right?

It certainly sounds good in a speech for a politician to say that “more education” is the answer, but in the end all it amounts to is a hollow promise.

Getting more Americans to go to college will not create any more jobs, but it will create more debt.  Americans now owe more than $884 billion on student loans, which is more than the total amount that Americans owe on their credit cards.

Empty Promise #3: America Will “Out-Build” The Rest Of The World And This Will Create More Jobs

So Barack Obama says that we are going to “out-build” the rest of the world?

Well, that certainly sounds good.

But what exactly does that mean?

Does it mean that we are going to quit shutting down our factories and tearing down our economic infrastructure?

After all, over 42,000 U.S. factories have closed down for good since 2001.

So is Obama going to do something to stop the flood of jobs and factories that are leaving the United States?

No, in fact he intends to “increase” trade with countries such as China and India.  That is going to mean that thousands more factories and millions more jobs are going to be “outsourced”.

Well, what about building up infrastructure such as roads, bridges, power grids, dams and ports?

That is certainly a very good idea.

According to the American Society of Civil Engineers, we need to spend approximately $2.2 trillion on infrastructure repairs and upgrades just to bring our existing infrastructure up to “good condition”.

So we desperately need some investment in that area.

But there is a big problem.

We are flat broke.

As will be discussed below, the U.S. government is flat broke.  Not only that, our state governments are flat broke and our local governments are flat broke.

So where will the trillions of dollars that we need for infrastructure come from?

Obama did not even come close to answering that question.

Empty Promise #4: America Will Become “The Best Place In The World To Do Business” And This Will Create More Jobs

It was incredible that Barack Obama could suggest that America is “the best place in the world to do business” with a straight face.

First of all, when you consider all forms of taxation, U.S. businesses face one of the most oppressive taxation regimes in the entire world.

But not only that, U.S. businesses also have to deal with one of the most horrific regulatory environments in the history of mankind.

As I have written about previously, the mountains of red tape that U.S. businesses have to wade through just continues to grow every single year.

The Federal Register is the main source of regulations for U.S. government agencies.  In 1936, the number of pages in the Federal Register was about 2,600.  Today, the Federal Register is over 80,000 pages long.

So is Barack Obama going to do anything about that?

Of course not.

In fact, Barack Obama and the Democrats have been really busy passing even more ridiculous regulations.

For example, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration is projecting that the food service industry will have to spend an additional 14 million hours every single year just to comply with new federal regulations that mandate that all vending machine operators and chain restaurants must label all products that they sell with a calorie count in a location visible to the consumer.

Empty Promise #5: Barack Obama Pledges To “Take Responsibility” For Our Deficit Spending

During Barack Obama’s first two years in office, the U.S. government added more to the U.S. national debt than the first 100 U.S. Congresses combined.

In fact, since Barack Obama took office, the U.S. government has gotten us into so much new debt that it breaks down to $10,429.64 for each of the 308,745,538 people counted by the 2010 U.S. census.

So is that “taking responsibility” for our deficit spending?

When Barack Obama took office, the U.S. national debt was 10.6 trillion dollars.

Today it is over 14 trillion dollars.

Government debt is absolutely out of control.  At this point, the U.S. national debt is increasing by roughly 4 billion dollars every single day.

If all of this debt is not brought under control, it will bring down the entire U.S. financial system.  According to a recent U.S. Treasury report to Congress, the U.S. national debt will reach 19.6 trillion dollars in 2015.

Can you imagine being 20 trillion dollars in debt?

That is 20,000,000,000,000 dollars.

So it would be really great if Barack Obama could do something about all of this debt, but based on his track record perhaps we should not be holding our breath.

Not that Obama is to blame for all of this.

The sad reality is that both parties have been involved in a massive debt orgy for decades and decades.  Now the day of reckoning is almost here and it is going to be incredibly painful.

We are in so much trouble that it is hard to even try to put it into words.  None of our politicians are telling us the whole truth.  We are headed for a complete and total disaster.

Entire Text (equal to 3 Rolls of Toilet Paper) of Obama’s State of the Union Address

Posted on: January 25th, 2011

The WaPo wiping edition

The WaPo wiping edition

Put on a pot of coffee Bertha….or just read it here and go have a nice dinner somewhere while you can still afford it.

This will be the “red eye” edition……someone must be getting paid by the paragraph????

Tonight I want to begin by congratulating the men and women of the 112th Congress, as well as your new Speaker, John Boehner. And as we mark this occasion, we are also mindful of the empty chair in this Chamber, and pray for the health of our colleague – and our friend – Gabby Giffords.

It’s no secret that those of us here tonight have had our differences over the last two years. The debates have been contentious; we have fought fiercely for our beliefs. And that’s a good thing. That’s what a robust democracy demands. That’s what helps set us apart as a nation.

But there’s a reason the tragedy in Tucson gave us pause. Amid all the noise and passions and rancor of our public debate, Tucson reminded us that no matter who we are or where we come from, each of us is a part of something greater – something more consequential than party or political preference.

We are part of the American family. We believe that in a country where every race and faith and point of view can be found, we are still bound together as one people; that we share common hopes and a common creed; that the dreams of a little girl in Tucson are not so different than those of our own children, and that they all deserve the chance to be fulfilled.

That, too, is what sets us apart as a nation.

Now, by itself, this simple recognition won’t usher in a new era of cooperation. What comes of this moment is up to us. What comes of this moment will be determined not by whether we can sit together tonight, but whether we can work together tomorrow.Story continues below

I believe we can. I believe we must. That’s what the people who sent us here expect of us. With their votes, they’ve determined that governing will now be a shared responsibility between parties. New laws will only pass with support from Democrats and Republicans. We will move forward together, or not at all – for the challenges we face are bigger than party, and bigger than politics.

At stake right now is not who wins the next election – after all, we just had an election. At stake is whether new jobs and industries take root in this country, or somewhere else. It’s whether the hard work and industry of our people is rewarded. It’s whether we sustain the leadership that has made America not just a place on a map, but a light to the world.

We are poised for progress. Two years after the worst recession most of us have ever known, the stock market has come roaring back. Corporate profits are up. The economy is growing again.

But we have never measured progress by these yardsticks alone. We measure progress by the success of our people. By the jobs they can find and the quality of life those jobs offer. By the prospects of a small business owner who dreams of turning a good idea into a thriving enterprise. By the opportunities for a better life that we pass on to our children.

That’s the project the American people want us to work on. Together.

We did that in December. Thanks to the tax cuts we passed, Americans’ paychecks are a little bigger today. Every business can write off the full cost of the new investments they make this year. These steps, taken by Democrats and Republicans, will grow the economy and add to the more than one million private sector jobs created last year.

But we have more work to do. The steps we’ve taken over the last two years may have broken the back of this recession – but to win the future, we’ll need to take on challenges that have been decades in the making.

Many people watching tonight can probably remember a time when finding a good job meant showing up at a nearby factory or a business downtown. You didn’t always need a degree, and your competition was pretty much limited to your neighbors. If you worked hard, chances are you’d have a job for life, with a decent paycheck, good benefits, and the occasional promotion. Maybe you’d even have the pride of seeing your kids work at the same company.

That world has changed. And for many, the change has been painful. I’ve seen it in the shuttered windows of once booming factories, and the vacant storefronts of once busy Main Streets. I’ve heard it in the frustrations of Americans who’ve seen their paychecks dwindle or their jobs disappear – proud men and women who feel like the rules have been changed in the middle of the game.

They’re right. The rules have changed. In a single generation, revolutions in technology have transformed the way we live, work and do business. Steel mills that once needed 1,000 workers can now do the same work with 100. Today, just about any company can set up shop, hire workers, and sell their products wherever there’s an internet connection.

Meanwhile, nations like China and India realized that with some changes of their own, they could compete in this new world. And so they started educating their children earlier and longer, with greater emphasis on math and science. They’re investing in research and new technologies. Just recently, China became home to the world’s largest private solar research facility, and the world’s fastest computer.

So yes, the world has changed. The competition for jobs is real. But this shouldn’t discourage us. It should challenge us. Remember – for all the hits we’ve taken these last few years, for all the naysayers predicting our decline, America still has the largest, most prosperous economy in the world. No workers are more productive than ours. No country has more successful companies, or grants more patents to inventors and entrepreneurs. We are home to the world’s best colleges and universities, where more students come to study than any other place on Earth.

What’s more, we are the first nation to be founded for the sake of an idea – the idea that each of us deserves the chance to shape our own destiny. That is why centuries of pioneers and immigrants have risked everything to come here. It’s why our students don’t just memorize equations, but answer questions like “What do you think of that idea? What would you change about the world? What do you want to be when you grow up?”

The future is ours to win. But to get there, we can’t just stand still. As Robert Kennedy told us, “The future is not a gift. It is an achievement.” Sustaining the American Dream has never been about standing pat. It has required each generation to sacrifice, and struggle, and meet the demands of a new age.

Now it’s our turn. We know what it takes to compete for the jobs and industries of our time. We need to out-innovate, out-educate, and out-build the rest of the world. We have to make America the best place on Earth to do business. We need to take responsibility for our deficit, and reform our government. That’s how our people will prosper. That’s how we’ll win the future. And tonight, I’d like to talk about how we get there.

The first step in winning the future is encouraging American innovation.

None of us can predict with certainty what the next big industry will be, or where the new jobs will come from. Thirty years ago, we couldn’t know that something called the Internet would lead to an economic revolution. What we can do – what America does better than anyone – is spark the creativity and imagination of our people. We are the nation that put cars in driveways and computers in offices; the nation of Edison and the Wright brothers; of Google and Facebook. In America, innovation doesn’t just change our lives. It’s how we make a living.

Our free enterprise system is what drives innovation. But because it’s not always profitable for companies to invest in basic research, throughout history our government has provided cutting-edge scientists and inventors with the support that they need. That’s what planted the seeds for the Internet. That’s what helped make possible things like computer chips and GPS.

Just think of all the good jobs – from manufacturing to retail – that have come from those breakthroughs.

Half a century ago, when the Soviets beat us into space with the launch of a satellite called Sputnik¸ we had no idea how we’d beat them to the moon. The science wasn’t there yet. NASA didn’t even exist. But after investing in better research and education, we didn’t just surpass the Soviets; we unleashed a wave of innovation that created new industries and millions of new jobs.

This is our generation’s Sputnik moment. Two years ago, I said that we needed to reach a level of research and development we haven’t seen since the height of the Space Race. In a few weeks, I will be sending a budget to Congress that helps us meet that goal. We’ll invest in biomedical research, information technology, and especially clean energy technology – an investment that will strengthen our security, protect our planet, and create countless new jobs for our people.

Already, we are seeing the promise of renewable energy. Robert and Gary Allen are brothers who run a small Michigan roofing company. After September 11th, they volunteered their best roofers to help repair the Pentagon. But half of their factory went unused, and the recession hit them hard.
Today, with the help of a government loan, that empty space is being used to manufacture solar shingles that are being sold all across the country. In Robert’s words, “We reinvented ourselves.”

That’s what Americans have done for over two hundred years: reinvented ourselves. And to spur on more success stories like the Allen Brothers, we’ve begun to reinvent our energy policy. We’re not just handing out money. We’re issuing a challenge. We’re telling America’s scientists and engineers that if they assemble teams of the best minds in their fields, and focus on the hardest problems in clean energy, we’ll fund the Apollo Projects of our time.

At the California Institute of Technology, they’re developing a way to turn sunlight and water into fuel for our cars. At Oak Ridge National Laboratory, they’re using supercomputers to get a lot more power out of our nuclear facilities. With more research and incentives, we can break our dependence on oil with biofuels, and become the first country to have 1 million electric vehicles on the road by 2015.

We need to get behind this innovation. And to help pay for it, I’m asking Congress to eliminate the billions in taxpayer dollars we currently give to oil companies. I don’t know if you’ve noticed, but they’re doing just fine on their own. So instead of subsidizing yesterday’s energy, let’s invest in tomorrow’s.

Now, clean energy breakthroughs will only translate into clean energy jobs if businesses know there will be a market for what they’re selling. So tonight, I challenge you to join me in setting a new goal: by 2035, 80% of America’s electricity will come from clean energy sources. Some folks want wind and solar. Others want nuclear, clean coal, and natural gas. To meet this goal, we will need them all – and I urge Democrats and Republicans to work together to make it happen.

Maintaining our leadership in research and technology is crucial to America’s success. But if we want to win the future – if we want innovation to produce jobs in America and not overseas – then we also have to win the race to educate our kids.

Think about it. Over the next ten years, nearly half of all new jobs will require education that goes beyond a high school degree. And yet, as many as a quarter of our students aren’t even finishing high school. The quality of our math and science education lags behind many other nations. America has fallen to 9th in the proportion of young people with a college degree. And so the question is whether all of us – as citizens, and as parents – are willing to do what’s necessary to give every child a chance to succeed.

That responsibility begins not in our classrooms, but in our homes and communities. It’s family that first instills the love of learning in a child. Only parents can make sure the TV is turned off and homework gets done. We need to teach our kids that it’s not just the winner of the Super Bowl who deserves to be celebrated, but the winner of the science fair; that success is not a function of fame or PR, but of hard work and discipline.

Our schools share this responsibility. When a child walks into a classroom, it should be a place of high expectations and high performance. But too many schools don’t meet this test. That’s why instead of just pouring money into a system that’s not working, we launched a competition called Race to the Top. To all fifty states, we said, “If you show us the most innovative plans to improve teacher quality and student achievement, we’ll show you the money.”

Race to the Top is the most meaningful reform of our public schools in a generation. For less than one percent of what we spend on education each year, it has led over 40 states to raise their standards for teaching and learning. These standards were developed, not by Washington, but by Republican and Democratic governors throughout the country. And Race to the Top should be the approach we follow this year as we replace No Child Left Behind with a law that is more flexible and focused on what’s best for our kids.

You see, we know what’s possible for our children when reform isn’t just a top-down mandate, but the work of local teachers and principals; school boards and communities.

Take a school like Bruce Randolph in Denver. Three years ago, it was rated one of the worst schools in Colorado; located on turf between two rival gangs. But last May, 97% of the seniors received their diploma. Most will be the first in their family to go to college. And after the first year of the school’s transformation, the principal who made it possible wiped away tears when a student said “Thank you, Mrs. Waters, for showing… that we are smart and we can make it.”

Let’s also remember that after parents, the biggest impact on a child’s success comes from the man or woman at the front of the classroom. In South Korea, teachers are known as “nation builders.” Here in America, it’s time we treated the people who educate our children with the same level of respect. We want to reward good teachers and stop making excuses for bad ones. And over the next ten years, with so many Baby Boomers retiring from our classrooms, we want to prepare 100,000 new teachers in the fields of science, technology, engineering, and math.

In fact, to every young person listening tonight who’s contemplating their career choice: If you want to make a difference in the life of our nation; if you want to make a difference in the life of a child – become a teacher. Your country needs you.

Of course, the education race doesn’t end with a high school diploma. To compete, higher education must be within reach of every American. That’s why we’ve ended the unwarranted taxpayer subsidies that went to banks, and used the savings to make college affordable for millions of students. And this year, I ask Congress to go further, and make permanent our tuition tax credit – worth $10,000 for four years of college.

Because people need to be able to train for new jobs and careers in today’s fast-changing economy, we are also revitalizing America’s community colleges. Last month, I saw the promise of these schools at Forsyth Tech in North Carolina. Many of the students there used to work in the surrounding factories that have since left town. One mother of two, a woman named Kathy Proctor, had worked in the furniture industry since she was 18 years old. And she told me she’s earning her degree in biotechnology now, at 55 years old, not just because the furniture jobs are gone, but because she wants to inspire her children to pursue their dreams too. As Kathy said, “I hope it tells them to never give up.”
If we take these steps – if we raise expectations for every child, and give them the best possible chance at an education, from the day they’re born until the last job they take – we will reach the goal I set two years ago: by the end of the decade, America will once again have the highest proportion of college graduates in the world.

One last point about education. Today, there are hundreds of thousands of students excelling in our schools who are not American citizens. Some are the children of undocumented workers, who had nothing to do with the actions of their parents. They grew up as Americans and pledge allegiance to our flag, and yet live every day with the threat of deportation. Others come here from abroad to study in our colleges and universities. But as soon as they obtain advanced degrees, we send them back home to compete against us. It makes no sense.

Now, I strongly believe that we should take on, once and for all, the issue of illegal immigration. I am prepared to work with Republicans and Democrats to protect our borders, enforce our laws and address the millions of undocumented workers who are now living in the shadows. I know that debate will be difficult and take time. But tonight, let’s agree to make that effort. And let’s stop expelling talented, responsible young people who can staff our research labs, start new businesses, and further enrich this nation.

The third step in winning the future is rebuilding America. To attract new businesses to our shores, we need the fastest, most reliable ways to move people, goods, and information – from high-speed rail to high-speed internet.

Our infrastructure used to be the best – but our lead has slipped. South Korean homes now have greater internet access than we do. Countries in Europe and Russia invest more in their roads and railways than we do. China is building faster trains and newer airports. Meanwhile, when our own engineers graded our nation’s infrastructure, they gave us a “D.”

We have to do better. America is the nation that built the transcontinental railroad, brought electricity to rural communities, and constructed the interstate highway system. The jobs created by these projects didn’t just come from laying down tracks or pavement. They came from businesses that opened near a town’s new train station or the new off-ramp.

Over the last two years, we have begun rebuilding for the 21st century, a project that has meant thousands of good jobs for the hard-hit construction industry. Tonight, I’m proposing that we redouble these efforts.

We will put more Americans to work repairing crumbling roads and bridges. We will make sure this is fully paid for, attract private investment, and pick projects based on what’s best for the economy, not politicians.

Within 25 years, our goal is to give 80% of Americans access to high-speed rail, which could allow you go places in half the time it takes to travel by car. For some trips, it will be faster than flying – without the pat-down. As we speak, routes in California and the Midwest are already underway.

Within the next five years, we will make it possible for business to deploy the next generation of high-speed wireless coverage to 98% of all Americans. This isn’t just about a faster internet and fewer dropped calls. It’s about connecting every part of America to the digital age. It’s about a rural community in Iowa or Alabama where farmers and small business owners will be able to sell their products all over the world. It’s about a firefighter who can download the design of a burning building onto a handheld device; a student who can take classes with a digital textbook; or a patient who can have face-to-face video chats with her doctor.

All these investments – in innovation, education, and infrastructure – will make America a better place to do business and create jobs. But to help our companies compete, we also have to knock down barriers that stand in the way of their success.

Over the years, a parade of lobbyists has rigged the tax code to benefit particular companies and industries. Those with accountants or lawyers to work the system can end up paying no taxes at all. But all the rest are hit with one of the highest corporate tax rates in the world. It makes no sense, and it has to change.

So tonight, I’m asking Democrats and Republicans to simplify the system. Get rid of the loopholes. Level the playing field. And use the savings to lower the corporate tax rate for the first time in 25 years – without adding to our deficit.

To help businesses sell more products abroad, we set a goal of doubling our exports by 2014 – because the more we export, the more jobs we create at home. Already, our exports are up. Recently, we signed agreements with India and China that will support more than 250,000 jobs in the United States. And last month, we finalized a trade agreement with South Korea that will support at least 70,000 American jobs. This agreement has unprecedented support from business and labor; Democrats and Republicans, and I ask this Congress to pass it as soon as possible.

Before I took office, I made it clear that we would enforce our trade agreements, and that I would only sign deals that keep faith with American workers, and promote American jobs. That’s what we did with Korea, and that’s what I intend to do as we pursue agreements with Panama and Colombia, and continue our Asia Pacific and global trade talks.

To reduce barriers to growth and investment, I’ve ordered a review of government regulations. When we find rules that put an unnecessary burden on businesses, we will fix them. But I will not hesitate to create or enforce commonsense safeguards to protect the American people. That’s what we’ve done in this country for more than a century. It’s why our food is safe to eat, our water is safe to drink, and our air is safe to breathe. It’s why we have speed limits and child labor laws. It’s why last year, we put in place consumer protections against hidden fees and penalties by credit card companies, and new rules to prevent another financial crisis. And it’s why we passed reform that finally prevents the health insurance industry from exploiting patients.

Now, I’ve heard rumors that a few of you have some concerns about the new health care law. So let me be the first to say that anything can be improved. If you have ideas about how to improve this law by making care better or more affordable, I am eager to work with you. We can start right now by correcting a flaw in the legislation that has placed an unnecessary bookkeeping burden on small businesses.

What I’m not willing to do is go back to the days when insurance companies could deny someone coverage because of a pre-existing condition. I’m not willing to tell James Howard, a brain cancer patient from Texas, that his treatment might not be covered. I’m not willing to tell Jim Houser, a small business owner from Oregon, that he has to go back to paying $5,000 more to cover his employees. As we speak, this law is making prescription drugs cheaper for seniors and giving uninsured students a chance to stay on their parents’ coverage. So instead of re-fighting the battles of the last two years, let’s fix what needs fixing and move forward.

Now, the final step – a critical step – in winning the future is to make sure we aren’t buried under a mountain of debt.

We are living with a legacy of deficit-spending that began almost a decade ago. And in the wake of the financial crisis, some of that was necessary to keep credit flowing, save jobs, and put money in people’s pockets.

But now that the worst of the recession is over, we have to confront the fact that our government spends more than it takes in. That is not sustainable. Every day, families sacrifice to live within their means. They deserve a government that does the same.

So tonight, I am proposing that starting this year, we freeze annual domestic spending for the next five years. This would reduce the deficit by more than $400 billion over the next decade, and will bring discretionary spending to the lowest share of our economy since Dwight Eisenhower was president.

This freeze will require painful cuts. Already, we have frozen the salaries of hardworking federal employees for the next two years. I’ve proposed cuts to things I care deeply about, like community action programs. The Secretary of Defense has also agreed to cut tens of billions of dollars in spending that he and his generals believe our military can do without.

I recognize that some in this Chamber have already proposed deeper cuts, and I’m willing to eliminate whatever we can honestly afford to do without. But let’s make sure that we’re not doing it on the backs of our most vulnerable citizens. And let’s make sure what we’re cutting is really excess weight. Cutting the deficit by gutting our investments in innovation and education is like lightening an overloaded airplane by removing its engine. It may feel like you’re flying high at first, but it won’t take long before you’ll feel the impact.

Now, most of the cuts and savings I’ve proposed only address annual domestic spending, which represents a little more than 12% of our budget. To make further progress, we have to stop pretending that cutting this kind of spending alone will be enough. It won’t.

The bipartisan Fiscal Commission I created last year made this crystal clear. I don’t agree with all their proposals, but they made important progress. And their conclusion is that the only way to tackle our deficit is to cut excessive spending wherever we find it – in domestic spending, defense spending, health care spending, and spending through tax breaks and loopholes.

This means further reducing health care costs, including programs like Medicare and Medicaid, which are the single biggest contributor to our long-term deficit. Health insurance reform will slow these rising costs, which is part of why nonpartisan economists have said that repealing the health care law would add a quarter of a trillion dollars to our deficit. Still, I’m willing to look at other ideas to bring down costs, including one that Republicans suggested last year: medical malpractice reform to rein in frivolous lawsuits.

To put us on solid ground, we should also find a bipartisan solution to strengthen Social Security for future generations. And we must do it without putting at risk current retirees, the most vulnerable, or people with disabilities; without slashing benefits for future generations; and without subjecting Americans’ guaranteed retirement income to the whims of the stock market.

And if we truly care about our deficit, we simply cannot afford a permanent extension of the tax cuts for the wealthiest 2% of Americans. Before we take money away from our schools, or scholarships away from our students, we should ask millionaires to give up their tax break.

It’s not a matter of punishing their success. It’s about promoting America’s success.

In fact, the best thing we could do on taxes for all Americans is to simplify the individual tax code. This will be a tough job, but members of both parties have expressed interest in doing this, and I am prepared to join them.

So now is the time to act. Now is the time for both sides and both houses of Congress – Democrats and Republicans – to forge a principled compromise that gets the job done. If we make the hard choices now to rein in our deficits, we can make the investments we need to win the future.

Let me take this one step further. We shouldn’t just give our people a government that’s more affordable. We should give them a government that’s more competent and efficient. We cannot win the future with a government of the past.

We live and do business in the information age, but the last major reorganization of the government happened in the age of black and white TV. There are twelve different agencies that deal with exports. There are at least five different entities that deal with housing policy. Then there’s my favorite example: the Interior Department is in charge of salmon while they’re in fresh water, but the Commerce Department handles them in when they’re in saltwater. And I hear it gets even more complicated once they’re smoked.

Now, we have made great strides over the last two years in using technology and getting rid of waste. Veterans can now download their electronic medical records with a click of the mouse. We’re selling acres of federal office space that hasn’t been used in years, and we will cut through red tape to get rid of more. But we need to think bigger. In the coming months, my administration will develop a proposal to merge, consolidate, and reorganize the federal government in a way that best serves the goal of a more competitive America. I will submit that proposal to Congress for a vote – and we will push to get it passed.

In the coming year, we will also work to rebuild people’s faith in the institution of government. Because you deserve to know exactly how and where your tax dollars are being spent, you will be able to go to a website and get that information for the very first time in history. Because you deserve to know when your elected officials are meeting with lobbyists, I ask Congress to do what the White House has already done: put that information online. And because the American people deserve to know that special interests aren’t larding up legislation with pet projects, both parties in Congress should know this: if a bill comes to my desk with earmarks inside, I will veto it.

A 21st century government that’s open and competent. A government that lives within its means. An economy that’s driven by new skills and ideas. Our success in this new and changing world will require reform, responsibility, and innovation. It will also require us to approach that world with a new level of engagement in our foreign affairs.

Just as jobs and businesses can now race across borders, so can new threats and new challenges. No single wall separates East and West; no one rival superpower is aligned against us.

And so we must defeat determined enemies wherever they are, and build coalitions that cut across lines of region and race and religion. America’s moral example must always shine for all who yearn for freedom, justice, and dignity. And because we have begun this work, tonight we can say that American leadership has been renewed and America’s standing has been restored.

Look to Iraq, where nearly 100,000 of our brave men and women have left with their heads held high; where American combat patrols have ended; violence has come down; and a new government has been formed. This year, our civilians will forge a lasting partnership with the Iraqi people, while we finish the job of bringing our troops out of Iraq. America’s commitment has been kept; the Iraq War is coming to an end.

Of course, as we speak, al Qaeda and their affiliates continue to plan attacks against us. Thanks to our intelligence and law enforcement professionals, we are disrupting plots and securing our cities and skies. And as extremists try to inspire acts of violence within our borders, we are responding with the strength of our communities, with respect for the rule of law, and with the conviction that American Muslims are a part of our American family.

We have also taken the fight to al Qaeda and their allies abroad. In Afghanistan, our troops have taken Taliban strongholds and trained Afghan Security Forces. Our purpose is clear – by preventing the Taliban from reestablishing a stranglehold over the Afghan people, we will deny al Qaeda the safe-haven that served as a launching pad for 9/11.

Thanks to our heroic troops and civilians, fewer Afghans are under the control of the insurgency. There will be tough fighting ahead, and the Afghan government will need to deliver better governance. But we are strengthening the capacity of the Afghan people and building an enduring partnership with them. This year, we will work with nearly 50 countries to begin a transition to an Afghan lead. And this July, we will begin to bring our troops home.

In Pakistan, al Qaeda’s leadership is under more pressure than at any point since 2001. Their leaders and operatives are being removed from the battlefield. Their safe-havens are shrinking. And we have sent a message from the Afghan border to the Arabian Peninsula to all parts of the globe: we will not relent, we will not waver, and we will defeat you.

American leadership can also be seen in the effort to secure the worst weapons of war. Because Republicans and Democrats approved the New START Treaty, far fewer nuclear weapons and launchers will be deployed. Because we rallied the world, nuclear materials are being locked down on every continent so they never fall into the hands of terrorists.

Because of a diplomatic effort to insist that Iran meet its obligations, the Iranian government now faces tougher and tighter sanctions than ever before. And on the Korean peninsula, we stand with our ally South Korea, and insist that North Korea keeps its commitment to abandon nuclear weapons.

This is just a part of how we are shaping a world that favors peace and prosperity. With our European allies, we revitalized NATO, and increased our cooperation on everything from counter-terrorism to missile defense. We have reset our relationship with Russia, strengthened Asian alliances, and built new partnerships with nations like India. This March, I will travel to Brazil, Chile, and El Salvador to forge new alliances for progress in the Americas. Around the globe, we are standing with those who take responsibility – helping farmers grow more food; supporting doctors who care for the sick; and combating the corruption that can rot a society and rob people of opportunity.

Recent events have shown us that what sets us apart must not just be our power – it must be the purpose behind it. In South Sudan – with our assistance – the people were finally able to vote for independence after years of war. Thousands lined up before dawn. People danced in the streets. One man who lost four of his brothers at war summed up the scene around him: “This was a battlefield for most of my life. Now we want to be free.”

We saw that same desire to be free in Tunisia, where the will of the people proved more powerful than the writ of a dictator. And tonight, let us be clear: the United States of America stands with the people of Tunisia, and supports the democratic aspirations of all people.

We must never forget that the things we’ve struggled for, and fought for, live in the hearts of people everywhere. And we must always remember that the Americans who have borne the greatest burden in this struggle are the men and women who serve our country.

Tonight, let us speak with one voice in reaffirming that our nation is united in support of our troops and their families. Let us serve them as well as they have served us – by giving them the equipment they need; by providing them with the care and benefits they have earned; and by enlisting our veterans in the great task of building our own nation.

Our troops come from every corner of this country – they are black, white, Latino, Asian and Native American. They are Christian and Hindu, Jewish and Muslim. And, yes, we know that some of them are gay. Starting this year, no American will be forbidden from serving the country they love because of who they love. And with that change, I call on all of our college campuses to open their doors to our military recruiters and the ROTC. It is time to leave behind the divisive battles of the past. It is time to move forward as one nation.

We should have no illusions about the work ahead of us. Reforming our schools; changing the way we use energy; reducing our deficit – none of this is easy. All of it will take time. And it will be harder because we will argue about everything. The cost. The details. The letter of every law.

Of course, some countries don’t have this problem. If the central government wants a railroad, they get a railroad – no matter how many homes are bulldozed. If they don’t want a bad story in the newspaper, it doesn’t get written.

And yet, as contentious and frustrating and messy as our democracy can sometimes be, I know there isn’t a person here who would trade places with any other nation on Earth.

We may have differences in policy, but we all believe in the rights enshrined in our Constitution. We may have different opinions, but we believe in the same promise that says this is a place where you can make it if you try. We may have different backgrounds, but we believe in the same dream that says this is a country where anything’s possible. No matter who you are. No matter where you come from.

That dream is why I can stand here before you tonight. That dream is why a working class kid from Scranton can stand behind me. That dream is why someone who began by sweeping the floors of his father’s Cincinnati bar can preside as Speaker of the House in the greatest nation on Earth.

That dream – that American Dream – is what drove the Allen Brothers to reinvent their roofing company for a new era. It’s what drove those students at Forsyth Tech to learn a new skill and work towards the future. And that dream is the story of a small business owner named Brandon Fisher.

Brandon started a company in Berlin, Pennsylvania that specializes in a new kind of drilling technology. One day last summer, he saw the news that halfway across the world, 33 men were trapped in a Chilean mine, and no one knew how to save them.

But Brandon thought his company could help. And so he designed a rescue that would come to be known as Plan B. His employees worked around the clock to manufacture the necessary drilling equipment. And Brandon left for Chile.

Along with others, he began drilling a 2,000 foot hole into the ground, working three or four days at a time with no sleep. Thirty-seven days later, Plan B succeeded, and the miners were rescued. But because he didn’t want all of the attention, Brandon wasn’t there when the miners emerged. He had already gone home, back to work on his next project.

Later, one of his employees said of the rescue, “We proved that Center Rock is a little company, but we do big things.”

We do big things.

From the earliest days of our founding, America has been the story of ordinary people who dare to dream. That’s how we win the future.

We are a nation that says, “I might not have a lot of money, but I have this great idea for a new company. I might not come from a family of college graduates, but I will be the first to get my degree. I might not know those people in trouble, but I think I can help them, and I need to try.

I’m not sure how we’ll reach that better place beyond the horizon, but I know we’ll get there. I know we will.”

We do big things.

The idea of America endures. Our destiny remains our choice. And tonight, more than two centuries later, it is because of our people that our future is hopeful, our journey goes forward, and the state of our union is strong.

Thank you, God Bless You, and may God Bless the United States of America.

OMG – Obama “High-Fived” Michelle After the Tucson Speech?!

Posted on: January 25th, 2011

Shirts are seen on chairs before a memorial service for the victims of Saturday's shootings at McKale Memorial Center on the University of Arizona campus  Wednesday, Jan. 12, 2011, in Tuscon, Ariz. (AP Photo/Charlie Riedel)

Shirts are seen on chairs before a memorial service for the victims of Saturday's shootings at McKale Memorial Center on the University of Arizona campus Wednesday, Jan. 12, 2011, in Tuscon, Ariz. (AP Photo/Charlie Riedel)

By Abraxas

I swear, I would give my right arm to get a picture of that. 

 http://newsflavor.com/politics/world-politics/white-house-insider-obama-celebrates-shortly-after-delivering-tucson-memorial-speech/ 

Here is something that you will never hear from the media but that some witnessed shortly after the (Tucson) memorial service had finished.  Behind the staging area, Obama gave Michelle a “high five” and shared a laugh with her.  So within minutes of seeing what is Obama’s finest moment as president it is followed by one of his worst.  It is this easy and always there contradiction in the president that concerns me very very much.  He was just thrilled at his performance.  That was priority #1 for him.  It always is.  The motivation for his speech was not to heal following the tragedy, but to further appeal to the public and get their approval of him.” 

This is spoken by the mysterious individual calling himself “White House Insider” who’s been spilling the beans about the Obama Administration to an equally mysterious online reporter called ‘Ulsterman’.  The Insider’s revelations have dwelt with everything from President Obama’s drug use in treating his depression, to the President’s abandonment of important White House meetings, to Michelle’s racism.  The Insider campaigned for Obama in 2008 but is now so disgusted with him that he’s rooting for Hillary to get the nomination in 2012.  The latest example of Obama’s moral failure is his cynical use of the blood of innocent victims to bolster his political fortune.  As the Insider puts it, “Even by DC political standards the human element in Obama seems to be utterly absent.  I don’t get it. I don’t understand it.” 

I also am disgusted – but it’s from having to listen to the Insider whine that he “doesn’t get it” about Obama’s moral corruption.  Oh, come on!  He expects me to believe that this is all a big surprise?  For God’s sake, two years ago Obama’s corruption was staring the whole world in the face.  Back then, his best friend was a Weatherman terrorist who whined he didn’t get to kill ‘more’ American soldiers; his pastor for 20 years was a racist who screamed ‘God D*MN America’ from his pulpit; his political sponsor was a sleazy slumlord; and, most of all, Barack himself had voted three times to deny medical aid to babies who’d survived late term abortions.  For crying out loud, in 2008 everyone saw Barack Hussein Obama paddling the backstroke in a sewer of filth and corruption.  But only now the Insider is ‘Shocked!  Shocked!’ the President isn’t smelling like a rose?

Yes, this picture of Obama high-fiving Michelle after that Tucson speech is disgusting.  But what I find even more disturbing is the picture of a blind follower who two years ago stared a corrupt, lying morally bankrupt politician in the face – and didn’t see a thing.

About That Google-Obama Connection…..

Posted on: January 24th, 2011

Did the collection of data for "Google Earth View" constitute an illegal wiretap?

Maybe the Consumer WatchDog group read UNCOVERAGE.net last week:  “Is Eric Schmidt OUT as Google CEO Because the Subpoenas are Coming?” 

Please add another “to-do” to your list, Rep. Issa?

 

Larry Page, Eric Schmidt and Sergey Brin of Google

SANTA MONICA, CA — Consumer Watchdog today sent Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA) a 32-page report detailing how Google has inappropriately, benefited from its close ties to the Obama Administration, including how NASA’s Moffett Airfield, near Google’s world headquarters, has been turned into a taxpayer-subsidized private airport for Google executives used for corporate junkets. 
 
A growing fleet of jets and helicopters stand ready to ferry the company’s top executives near or far, for business or pleasure, for vacations or schmoozing, including at least three wintertime trips to the Caribbean and a trip by Google chief executive Eric Schmidt to the Cannes Film Festival.  Humanitarian groups, by contrast, have been denied access to the airport.
 
Consumer Watchdog asked the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee to investigate the relationship between Google Inc. and the US government as well as the Wi-Spy incident, and to call CEO Eric Schmidt to testify under oath. 
 
In a letter to Issa, Jamie Court, Consumer Watchdog president and John M. Simpson, Inside Google Project director, wrote:
 
“An investigation by the committee of Google’s relationship to the Administration is particularly timely now in light of the way the Federal Trade Commission closed its probe of the Wi-Spy incident, and the Department of Justice’s current review of the pending acquisition of ITA Software.”   
 
Read the full report here:
http://insidegoogle.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/GOOGGovfinal012411.pdf 
 
Read the letter to Rep. Issa here:
http://insidegoogle.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/LtrIssa012411final.pdf

 

The report, Lost in the Cloud: Google and the US Government, is drawn from records obtained through the Freedom of Information Act and interviews. It found that Google’s ambitious quest for influence with the government is starting to pay off. Among other issues raised by the report are: 

  • Google’s close ties with the Obama White House have raised concerns about possible special treatment or conflicts of interest at the Department of Homeland Security, the US Patent & Trademark Office, the Federal Communications Commission and NASA.
  • Officials at both DHS and the FCC have raised pointed concerns about weak privacy protections in Google products and whether Google’s well-documented difficulties with privacy protection could create big problems for federal agencies that use its services. Nonetheless no-bid contracts have been given to Google.
  • A secretive relationship with the National Security Agency. The search giant has a legitimate need to cooperate with the government’s mammoth and secretive code breaking agency in its efforts to defend the integrity of US computer networks. But NSA also has legal power to force Google to hand over the private information of its users. How Google executives handle this potentially conflicted relationship is largely unknown: neither Google nor the NSA are talking.

 
One of the most visible signs of Google’s clout, the report said, is the National Aeronautics and Space Administration’s Moffett Airfield, near Google’s world headquarters. When a deal between NASA and top Google executives to use the base was first disclosed in 2007, it called for only four jets to use the base. 
 
But newly released government records show that the Google executive fleet has now grown to six jets and two helicopters, while at least 40 Google employees hold security badges at the base and all of the planes are supplied with Department of Defense jet fuel. 
 
While the deal was originally struck between Google and NASA in the name of scientific research by the Google fleet, NASA documents show that precious little research has occurred. According to a set of emails obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request, a fighter jet bought by Google executives in 2008 to perform the research was still being reviewed for air-worthiness in mid-2010.
 
Meanwhile, flight records show that the other jets parked by Google executives at the NASA field are often used for junkets, vacations and schmoozing. These include at least three wintertime trips to the Caribbean and a trip by Google chief executive Eric Schmidt to the Cannes Film Festival, where he hobnobbed with Mick Jagger and Hollywood stars.
 
 “Our report only reveals only part of the picture,” said the letter to Issa asking for an investigation. “The House Oversight & Government Reform Committee has subpoena power if necessary.  We urge you to use all the tools at the committee’s disposal to reveal the extent of Google’s influence on the government and how the Internet giant has unfairly benefited.”
 
Consumer Watchdog’s letter also noted:
 
“Several executive agencies have responded in a severely guarded and limited fashion to Freedom of Information Act requests on significant issues involving Google that the public deserves to know more about.
 
“In addition, there has been insufficient federal action on Google’s “Wi-Spy” debacle in which its Street View cars gathered private data from Wi-Fi networks in more than 30 countries.
 
“This is the largest wire tapping scandal in world history by one of America’s biggest and most powerful corporations, yet there has not been a single hearing on Capitol Hill. We respectfully submit that Google CEO Eric Schmidt should be asked to testify under oath so that the American public learns the truth about Wi-Spy.”
 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MissHell Knows Squat About Bling

Posted on: January 22nd, 2011

By Abraxas

For heaven’s sake, can’t anyone teach that woman how to dress?

http://nymag.com/daily/fashion/2010/05/michelle_obama_wears_prabal_gu.html#comments

A $17,500 bracelet??

Okay, I’ll concede that the red dress actually looks nice.  But that’s not saying much compared to the blue shower curtain gown for the President of Mexico, the cat-pee-sofa dress and that 3-sizes too big puke green outfit she wore in Indonesia (during which she made us all watch as she dug a finger in her crotch).  But, what the heck, I can be magnanimous and give a compliment when it’s deserved.  The dress really is a pretty color.

Michelle Obama's "cat pee on the sofa" dress Courtesy: HillBuzz

Michelle Obama's "cat pee on the sofa" dress Courtesy: HillBuzz

I can not, however, compliment those ghastly bracelets.  First off, they clash badly with one another and neither of them compliments the dress – but most of all they’re too fricking big.  Either one of them would have been stretching it but wearing two of them together on the same wrist?  That’s about as dumb as plonking two tiaras on her head or draping two necklaces around her throat.  The article gushes the bracelets are expensive – both have ‘rose cut diamonds’ – but to be honest, they look cheap plastic to me.

And, while we’re at it, those stupid earrings don’t coordinate with either the dress or the bling clanging on her left arm.  Face it, this woman knows squat about accessorizing.

And there’s one curious note.  Apparently MissHell has replaced her wedding band with a large-stoned cocktail ring.  The article explains her removal of proof she’s married to Obama by saying her cocktail ring is “costume to balance out the spendiness of her left arm“.  (What on earth is ‘spendiness’?)  Unfortunately, however, instead of making her look ‘balanced’, the cocktail ring only makes her look lopsided what with her left arm slathered with bling practically up to her elbow while her right arm is left bare naked.  Ridiculous.

I’ll say it again.  Michelle thinking expensive jewelry will turn her into Jackie is like Prissy thinking green curtains will turn her into Scarlet.

Joan Rivers had a skit calling Michelle Obama "Blacky O" but decided to pull the material before the show. Why so wimpy, JR?

Guess Hu from the GOP Dined with the Dictator?

Posted on: January 20th, 2011

Mary Pat and Chris Christie, who, because they are AMERICANS and not living in CHINA under President HU, are free to keep ALL of their children

Adding to the total moral and ethical disintegration of New Jersey Governor Chris Christie ( in case you need to be brought up to speed on his deep and abiding affection for Al Qaida fundraisers and Hamas agents, please read the below links) guess WHO was the ONLY REPUBLICAN to attend the Obama state dinner for the brutal dictator of China, “President” Hu Jintao?

CHRIS CHRISTIE

(because, by the way, George Schultz and Henry Kissinger are NOT REAL REPUBLICANs.)

House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio), and Senate Minority leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), the other token GOPs invited to the state dinner, to their everlasting credit and my eternal esteem, REFUSED TO DINE WITH HU.

Hu’s the Boss: Mission Accomplished!

Hu’s the Boss, Chapter 2: Hu in De House

Is Chris Christie Naive About Radical Islam — or Lying?

Gov. Chris Christie’s Ties to Radical Islam: Deal-breaker

Cross-posted at RIGHT WING News

Hawaii Governor Still Trying to Shovel Out of Birther Controversy (and making it worse)

Posted on: January 20th, 2011

 

Governor Abercrombie, when he was a Hawaii Congressman, gave a news conference to protest the war in Iraq. He said protesters were getting their hands tied by U.S. government

Hawaii Governor (finally) Finds Obama Certificate (except it’s not a certificate..…..) 

By Jame Jamison

The Obama-loving governor of Hawaii is stuck in a web of his own making……..it could be that the former 60s hippie burn-out should have kept his mouth SHUT……..because everything he says to PROVE that Barack Obama is a “natural born citizen,” born fair and square in the state of Hawaii,  has ended up raising more questions.

We reported last week that incoming Hawaii governor Neil Abercrombie was embarrassed to admit that despite his EARLIER statements (when he took office)  that he had PROOF of Obama’s Hawaii birth, he HADN’T  ACTUALLY FOUND it yet in the Hawaiian archives.

Today we learn from the U.K. Daily Mail  that Governor Abercrombie  HAS found proof of Hawaiian birth…but it’s not REALLY a legal certificate….it’s……ummmmmmm………..written down somewhere…..or something.   And whatEVER it is that he HAS supposed found, he is not letting us SEE it yet.

See if you can follow this:  [emphasis mine]

“Pressure was mounting on Hawaii Governor Neil Abercrombie today amid increasing confusion over whether President Obama was born there.

Abercrombie said on Tuesday that an investigation had unearthed papers proving Obama was born in Hawaii in 1961.

He told Honolulu’s Star-Advertiser: ‘It actually exists in the archives, written down,’ he said.

But it became apparent that what had been discovered was an unspecified listing or notation of Obama’s birth that someone had made in the state archives and not a birth certificate.

And in the same interview Abercrombie suggested that a long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate for Barack Obama may not exist within the vital records maintained by the Hawaii Department of Health.

He said efforts were still being made to track down definitive vital records that would prove Obama was born in Hawaii.”

Someone take a can opener to the Hawaii statehouse.  Or a subpoena.  We’re finally on to something now, and the delicious part, is Obama’s undoing on this is coming at the hands of an Obama koolaid drinker  who  really, really wants to HELP Obama.  With this kind of “help,” does Obama need enemies? 

HAHAHAHA!!!!

BTW, you ARE noticing that this is the British media covering this story….not the American MSM??

New (Democrat Obama-Loving) Hawaii Governor “Can’t Find” Obama Birth Certificate

Posted on: January 19th, 2011

It’s been awhile since I have updated the Obama “documentation” issue, and there are some interesting new developments. ( I call it the “documentation” issue, rather than the birth certificate issue, because there is SO MUCH MORE than the birth certificate that is “missing” from Obama’s background – parentage, where he has lived, citizenship, college records, foreign internet donations in 2008 and so on.)

Author Jack Cashill has a new book coming mid-February, “Deconstructing Obama,” and wrote this article for American Thinker this week.

The most intriguing development to me is the election in November of an aging love-child Democrat governor in Hawaii who immediately began giving news interviews saying that he was going to “clear up” all the questions about Obama’s birth in Hawaii.  But now it’s January, and lo and behold, the Obama-apologist CAN’T FIND the birth certificate??   OOOOOOOOPS!!

Read on, but also keep in mind that there is nothing much that can happen with the current temperament and structure of the Congress.  Getting to the Supreme Court some day…a crap shoot at best….right now.   Let’s focus on the new Congress, and keep their squidgy rumps to the fire.  That said, here is the latest:

Hawaii Governor Neil Abercrombie

World Net Daily: Hawaii governor can’t find Obama birth certificate

Suggests controversy could hurt president’s re-election chances

By Jerome R. Corsi

Hawaii Gov. Neil Abercrombie suggested in an interview published today that a long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate for Barack Obama may not exist within the vital records maintained by the Hawaii Department of Health.

Abercrombie told the Honolulu Star Advertiser he was searching within the Hawaii Department of Health to find definitive vital records that would prove Obama was born in Hawaii, because the continuing eligibility controversy could hurt the president’s chances of re-election in 2012.

Donalyn Dela Cruz, Abercrombie’s spokeswoman in Honolulu, ignored again yesterday another in a series of repeated requests made by WND for an interview with the governor.

Toward the end of the interview, the newspaper asked Abercrombie: “You stirred up quite a controversy with your comments regarding birthers and your plan to release more information regarding President Barack Obama’s birth certificate. How is that coming?”

In his response, Abercrombie acknowledged the birth certificate issue will have “political implications” for the next presidential election “that we simply cannot have.”

Suggesting he was still intent on producing more birth records on Obama from the Hawaii Department of Health vital records vault, Abercrombie told the newspaper there was a recording of the Obama birth in the state archives that he wants to make public.

Abercrombie did not report to the newspaper that he or the Hawaii Department of Health had found Obama’s long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate. The governor only suggested his investigations to date had identified an unspecified listing or notation of Obama’s birth that someone had made in the state archives.

“It was actually written, I am told, this is what our investigation is showing, it actually exists in the archives, written down,” Abercrombie said.

For seemingly the first time, Abercrombie frankly acknowledge that presidential politics motivated his search for Obama birth records, implying that failure to resolve the questions that remain unanswered about the president’s birth and early life may damage his chance for re-election.

“If there is a political agenda (regarding Obama’s birth certificate), then there is nothing I can do about that, nor can the president,” he said.

So far, the only birth document available on Obama is a Hawaii Certification of Live Birth that first appeared on the Internet during the 2008 presidential campaign. It was posted by two purportedly independent websites that have displayed a strong partisan bias for Obama – Snopes.com released the COLB in June 2008, and FactCheck.org published photographs of the document in August 2008.

WND previously reported the Hawaii Department of Health has refused to authenticate the COLB posted on the Internet by Snopes.com and FactCheck.org.

WND has reported that in 1961, Obama’s grandparents, Stanley and Madelyn Dunham, could have made an in-person report of a Hawaii birth even if the infant Barack Obama Jr. had been foreign-born.

Similarly, the newspaper announcements of Obama’s birth do not prove he was born in Hawaii, since they could have been triggered by the grandparents registering the birth as Hawaiian, even if the baby was born elsewhere.

Moreover, WND has documented that the address reported in the newspaper birth announcements was the home of the grandparents.

WND also has reported that Barack Obama Sr. maintained his own separate apartment in Honolulu, even after he was supposedly married to Ann Dunham, Barack Obama’s mother, and that Dunham left Hawaii within three weeks of the baby’s birth to attend the University of Washington in Seattle.

Dunham did not return to Hawaii until after Barack Obama Sr. left Hawaii in June 1962 to attend graduate school at Harvard University in Cambridge, Mass.

Conceivably, the yet undisclosed birth record in the state archives that Abercrombie has discovered may have come from the grandparents registering Obama’s birth, an event that would have triggered both the newspaper birth announcements and availability of a Certification of Live Birth, even if no long-form birth certificate existed.

WND has also reported that Tim Adams, a former senior elections clerk for the city and county of Honolulu in 2008, has maintained that there is no long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate on file with the Hawaii Department of Health and that neither Honolulu hospital – Queens Medical Center or Kapiolani Medical Center – has any record that Obama was born there.

Previously on UNCOVERAGE.net:

Obama’s “Make-Believe” Life

Is Obama Headed for Supreme Court Smackdown?

Is Obama’s “Watergate” A-Brewing?

Update on Obama’s Eligibility: “Guilty” at Columbia Trial

Private Investigator Report on Obama Eligibility

More Questions About Obama’s Birth/Parentage

Tea Party Convention: Obama’s Birthplace, Legal Issues

Because of Obama We Are Coming Apart, Not Coming Together

Posted on: January 17th, 2011

By Abraxas

For nearly two months, the Democrats have been sweaty palmed about a certain poll conducted by Edison Research during last November’s elections.  That poll told them something they did not want to hear: President Obama has polarized voters along race lines. 

Exactly 75 percent of minority voters said they approved; only 22 percent said they disapproved. Among white voters, just 35 percent approved of the president’s performance, while 65 percent disapproved; a head-turning 49 percent of whites said they strongly disapproved. (Those whites voted Republican last fall by a ratio of 18-to-1.)

http://www.nationaljournal.com/magazine/in-2012-obama-may-need-a-new-coalition-20110105 

To put it into simplistic non-PC terms:  blacks love him and whites don’t. 

Of course, given the Democrats’ penchant for rewriting history (and Mark Twain), they’ll naturally want to tinker with these bad numbers to make them say white voters like Obama, they really like him.  But unfortunately for them, these poll numbers are too high to do that.  We’re not talking 5, 10 or even 20 percent of white voters who have turned away from Obama – it’s 60%.  As the National Journal article points out, this percentage against Obama’s party is the worst since Edison Research began polling almost three decades ago.  That lopsided margin even exceeds the numbers achieved by Republicans in the congressional landslide election of 1994.  (Yes, Virginia, it is that bad.)

In contrast, a whopping 73% of black voters are in favor of Obama.  These incredibly lopsided numbers for both sides mean one thing: they reflect a permanent mindset that isn’t going to change any time soon.  

Ironically, the reason why voters have split along racial lines has nothing to do with race.  The split is instead due to each group’s polar opposite reaction to government intrusion in their lives.  In a nutshell, whites want government to butt out of their affairs whereas black voters want it to take up permanent residence in their living rooms.  Since the socialist Obama has championed government intrusion, he’s naturally polarized the two racial groups into either adoring him or being utterly disgusted with him.

And it isn’t just white Republican voters who don’t like Obama; he’s antagonized that same racial group in his own party – specifically blue collar males.  That latter group is particularly unfriendly to him due to its perception of the Democratic party being controlled by East Coast elitists and minorities.  This obviously hurts Obama since he is the epitome of an elitist minority (arugula, anyone?). 

And there’s one further piece of bad news for Obama – this antagonism isn’t disappearing any time soon.  “According to veteran conservative strategist Jeff Bell, all signs suggest that Obama has permanently antagonized much of the white electorate (nearly half of which this year identified itself as conservative in the exit poll).”  To make matters worse, that disaffected group has found a welcoming new place to go to: the Tea Party.  To round off the bad news, there’s nothing Obama and his party can do to counter this because the Tea Party is not “situational”.  What this means is that a situation such as the bad economy or the war in Afghanistan, etc., is not what foments the anger of Tea Party members.  They’re driven instead by powerful philosophical and moral differences with Obama.  So unless he suddenly becomes a born again Christian and disavows Marx, those differences will still be there even if the recession ends tomorrow morning. 

So what kind of support can Obama count on in the voting booth?  Well, obviously, he has the minorities and, not surprisingly, also the young, first time voters.  But the Edison report revealed a surprising third group which Obama still has tremendous pull with: white, liberal, college educated females.  This last group’s support is crucial: polls show it decided the Senatorial elections in Colorado and California.  This group’s clout is even greater due to the fact that it dominates the area where Obama’s strength is greatest – cities (especially those along the East Coast). 

The thing to remember, however, is that only about half of this group is loyal to him.  The other half still tends to (somewhat) vote Republican.  This tepid support is crucial for Obama because if the GOP fields a candidate who is deeply conservative (and especially pro-life), the white liberal female vote catapults over to his side.  That’s a critical swing, as was proven by the Senate election in Colorado.  Since Bennet tanked amongst white male voters, he should have lost; however, he still scraped out a win because liberal female voters sided with him after having been turned off by his opponent whom they saw as too conservative and pro-life.    

These then are the problems which the Edison report has revealed for Obama in the 2012 election.  The President may surmount these problems – and then again he may not.  Naturally, Obama’s camp is claiming he will.  It’s a little hard for me to say at this moment but frankly, if I were one of the President’s advisors, I would be having very sweaty palms right now.  But don’t listen to me – I’m just a white college educated female.

Family of Slain Soldier “Stung” by Treatment from Obama, Senator

Posted on: January 8th, 2011

It is bad enough that President Obama took the time and effort  last month to call the owner of the Philadelphia Eagles pro football team to congratulate the hiring of convicted dog-torturer Michael Vick.  Now comes the story that the President, during that same  week that he had time to fuss over a convicted felon pro quarterback , refused to call the grieving family of a fallen soldier when requested to do so. 

A shameful chain of circumstances having to do with a hero’s death have still not been rectified or even recognized by the inhabitant of the White House.  The U.S. Senator from the family’s state sent a form letter of condolence with the wrong name.

Sgt. Sean Collins

Sgt. Sean Collins died with 5 of his fellow soldiers on December 12 in a suicide attack on their Kandahar province combat outpost. Read more about Sgt. Collins here.

Our thoughts and prayers are with the Collins family.

FOX News:

It was bad enough that after Sgt. Sean Collins was killed in Afghanistan his parents received a senator’s letter of condolence with the wrong name. 

But the soldier’s father says the White House added to the sting by subsequently turning down a request for President Obama to personally call Collins’ mother. 

Pat Collins, a retired lieutenant colonel, told Q13 FOX in Seattle that the family was told last month that the president could not fit it “into his schedule” to call mother Linda Collins about their son’s death. Pat Collins, who initially made the request with the White House, said he would’ve understood, except for the fact that around the same time, Obama found an opening in his schedule for a much-publicized phone conversation with Eagles owner Jeffrey Lurie. 

“He is the president of the United States, and he’s a very busy man, very important man — but then to find out that he fit it into his schedule to call the president of the Eagles to thank him for giving Michael Vick a second chance, that kind of burns a little bit,” Collins said. 

The White House’s response marked another “disappointing” turn for the family in the government’s handling of their son’s death. 

After the attack, the Collins family received a letter of condolence from Washington Sen. Maria Cantwell. The top of the letter got Sgt. Sean Collins’ name right, but the final paragraph referred to him as “Bryn.” 

Linda Collins, in an interview with Q13 FOX, called the mistake “a little disappointing.” 

Cantwell has since acknowledged the error, and the Collins family has accepted her apology. 

It’s unclear who the family may have spoken with in the White House regarding the possibility of a presidential phone call. 

Pat Collins said he was told within “two or three days” of asking that his request would not be granted. Though Collins voiced concern that Obama carved out time to talk about the Eagles’ Vick, that discussion was part of a broader conversation between Obama and Lurie about the use of alternative energy at Lincoln Financial Field

A senior administration official told Fox News that the president remains committed to honoring the troops. 

“The president honors the sacrifice of all our men and women in uniform and sends hand-signed letters to the families of those who lost their lives. My understanding is that President Bush had the same policy,” the official said. 

Aside from sending hand-signed letters, Bush also reportedly met privately with hundreds of families of troops who died in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

 

Post to Twitter

Starving the ObamaCare Beast

Posted on: January 7th, 2011

Starving The Beast

Defunding ObamaCare Is Underway 

By Dell Hill

Here at Uncoverage.net, we’ve talked about the process that might be used to rid the world of Obamacare and now that process is coming into much clearer focus.  Not a soul on the planet believes that a Democrat controlled Senate, or a Democrat controlled White House would ever let a total repeal bill become law, therefore the only logical way to get rid of it is to starve it to death……as in ‘defund it’.  If there’s no money appropriated to run it, it will sit dead in the water

 Matt Cover has the Republican plan of action to defund Obamacare in this report from CNSNews. 

 Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wis., speaks at a news conference on Capitol Hill in this March 19, 2010, photo. Republicans are promising to repeal and replace President Barack Obama’s health care overhaul if they win control of Congress. (AP File Photo/Harry Hamburg)

“House Budget Chairman Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) said on Thursday that the budget produced by his committee will reflect spending levels that assume Obamacare has been repealed and that Republicans will then use “mechanisms” inserted into the annual appropriations bills that fund the various departments of the federal government to stop Obamacare.

Given the widely accepted assumption that the Democratic majority Senate and President Barack Obama will not agree to legislation that repeals Obamacare, CNSNews.com asked Ryan if Republicans were going to defund implementation of the health-care legislation instead.

Under the Constitution, the Executive Branch cannot spend money unless it has been appropriated by Congress, and Congress cannot appropriate money without the approval of both the Senate and the House, which the Republicans now control. 

“Everyone expects that the repeal bill will pass the House and then either not pass the Senate or certainly not get signed by the president,” CNSNews.com asked.  “In your budget will there be any funding for that bill?”

“So, obviously we plan on repealing it and our budget should reflect repeal of the health care law, and we will do that,” said Ryan.  “The real question I think you are trying to get at is defunding this law.  That occurs in the appropriations process. So, what the budget does is send the numbers, the cap, to the appropriators.  They write the spending bills.  And inside of those spending bills is where we do plan on pursuing other mechanisms of trying to repeal this law.”

CNSNews.com asked Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D.-Nev.) if he would shut down the government in order to save Obamacare if the Republican majority House sent the Senate appropriations bills that included language prohibiting funding for the implementation of Obamacare.  Reid did not directly answer the question, but said House Republicans “have to understand that the health care bill is not going to be repealed” and that they “should get a new lease on life and talk about something else.”

Read the entire CNS report here. 

Reid is obviously smoking those unlabeled cigs again.  He knows (and has known since November 2, 2010) that this is exactly what was going to happen and the Democrat brain-trust has had that long to formulate a plan to stop it.  They have no such plan and Reid’s statement that “the health care bill is not going to be repealed” ranks right up there with several of his other brilliant statements, such as “Somebody tell Bush the war is lost”.

There’s a presidential election in 2012 and if a Republican is elected to take over the White House, along with just a few more seats in the Senate and Obamacare would be repealed so fast it would leave Reid wondering what the Hell just happened.  I realize that’s a big ‘if’, but no one envisioned a 64 seat change in the House of Representatives last Fall and that’s exactly what happened. 

For that reason and that reason alone, you’ll see a distinct change in how the president conducts himself over the next year.  His 2012 re-election campaign has officially begun. 

Gibbs Moves from WhiteHouser to WhiteWasher

Posted on: January 5th, 2011

‘Beltway Bob’ Gibbs Moves On To Campaign Consultant for Obama

By Dell Hill

Update:  Gibbs says he can “serve” Obama better from the “outside” as a pundit/spinner/liar/money-grubber.  2012 underway.

See also: Vice President Joe Biden’s Chief of Staff jumps ship, too

 According to FOXNews (and every other news source in the world), Press Secretary Robert Gibbs is stepping down as the chief spokesman for the White House to become an outside adviser to the president and his re-election campaign, Fox News has confirmed.

 

No successor has been immediately named.  But Gibbs told The New York Times, which first reported the departure, that a replacement will likely be announced within the next two weeks.”

 

And why is it exactly that we should care?  Who is this Robert Gibbs person you speak of?  And why would this make banner headline news?

 

For many years the MSM has glorified the position of presidential press secretary to the point where the position is seen as something very special.  Almost as though we were hearing from the President himself, which is borderline lunacy.  The press secretary is little more than a walking, talking political ad for the president, his agenda and his political party.  Nothing more; usually a lot less.

 

It’s difficult for me to understand why we continue to see the emphasis on daily press briefings from the White House.  All you have to do is see or hear one and you’ve seen and heard them all.  Questions are asked and political speeches are given, but no answers ever seem to come forth.

 

Example:  “Robert (the press like to talk on a first name basis.  It gives them a closer relationship), how does the President feel about the issues raised by the Russian government over the preamble to the START Treaty….and isn’t this exactly what the Republicans in the Senate were warning about?

 

Gibbs:  “Well, Dell (Gibbs likes to talk to the press corps on a first name basis.  It gives him the same feeling of a closer relationship), you see the President has been focusing on this issue day and night, for months.  The START Treaty is critical to the immediate and future defense of both Russia and the United States, not to mention our friends and allies in Europe.  That’s why it was so critical that the Senate ratify this agreement.  The President is very pleased with the bi-partisan work in the Senate on this extremely important vote and has personally called several Republican Senators to thank them for all their hard work on this vitally important document.  Of course the Democrats in the Senate all put the future of our country first and, therefore, voted unanimously in favor of reducing the outrageous nuclear stockpiles of both countries.  Many of the Republicans didn’t and now, because of some minor technicality in the wording of the preamble, we’ve hit a minor bump in the road.  The President is confident that this isn’t anywhere near as important as those Republican Senators would have you believe.  Next question, please?”

 

About 450 words that qualify as political mumbo-jumbo from one of the Masters of political mumbo-jumbo — “Beltway Bob” Gibbs.

 

I gave Gibbs that ‘Beltway Bob’ name in honor of the infamous Baghdad Bob, the press secretary for Saddam Hussein, who famously announced on live TV that “the Americans aren’t at the airport….the Americans aren’t anywhere near Baghdad.”  As he was making his statement, the first US Army Abrams tanks were turning the corner and coming into view directly behind the slick-talking Iraqi mouthpiece.

 

And thus it is with Beltway Bob Gibbs, whose job now will be to make the rounds of the talk-show circuit, postulating and bloviating the socialist ideology that is Barack Obama.

 

Does Barack Heart Charlie for Vice President?

Posted on: January 3rd, 2011

"How about we ditch the bitches and go get tapas tonight?"

“Is that Calvin Klein you’re wearing? How about we ditch the bitches and go get tapas tonight?”

Charlie (the crap-weasel) Crist for Vice President??  OMG……

But wait,  could this be GOOD for the Republicans?

From Sharky at the SharkTank:In spite of assertions made to the contrary by Vice President Joe Biden, speculation continues to swirl around the possibility that President Obama will replace Biden on the 2012 Presidential ticket for someone with less of a propensity for gaffes as well as for a younger and more ‘moderate’ candidate in order to appeal to the thousands of disenfranchised ‘Independents’ across the country.  If Obama really is intent on throwing Biden under the bus, I would not be surprised if he chooses none other than the tanned and ‘Independent’ one himself, Charlie Crist.  

Many will no doubt think that this would be an unlikely move by Obama, especially after Crist was trounced by Senator-elect Marco Rubio in this past November’s general election. Others seem to think that Crist will run as an Independent, or maybe even a Democrat in one of the upcoming Congressional races, but I think that’s unlikely. 

Let’s analyze this potentially savvy move by the President.

Charlie Crist, once a very popular sitting Governor, finishes the year with a remarkable 50% approval rating-even after losing to Rubio by 19 points. Crist finished with 30% of the vote, while Democrat Kendrick Meek finished 3rd with 20%. This numbers are very telling when you consider that if Crist ran as a Democrat, and not just a Democrat-lite candidate, he would have garnered, at least 10-15% more of the vote and made it a fairly close election.  Whether he’s a Republican, Democrat, or Independent, Governor Crist is still very popular amongst Floridians and he would be able to deliver a potential Obama-Crist ticket a considerable amount of Independent votes and perhaps some of his GOP loyalists’ votes.

Governor Crist has already stated that he would have left the GOP regardless of his lagging poll numbers early last year, and he publicly stated his true feelings towards Republicans on the following Shark Tank video which circulated across the country.

Another point to consider is that Obama has fallen out of favor with many conservative-leaning Democrats, so with Crist on the ticket, it would be a brilliant head fake by President Obama as coming across as being somewhat bipartisian in picking the ‘Independent’ Crist. We should also take into consideration that Governor Crist has been in lock-step with Obama’s agenda back to January of 2009. Remember the notorious hug where Crist literally embraced Obama and his failed Stimulus Plan?  How about when Crist stated that he would have voted for Obamacare?

 
Also: Governor Crist received substantial support from Democrat leaders and activists throughout Florida, as well as more than a few ‘tingle up my leg’ TV pundits. The charismatic Crist is still an impeccably polished and relentless politico who is always in “campaign mode”, and he’s demonstrated that he is always looking to advance his career by climbing the political rungs.  While a Congressional run is probably out of the picture, if the opportunity to be the next Vice President of the United States were presented to him, he would immediately seize it.  It is impossible to overstate Charlie Crist’s ambition, ego, and his political appeal; and President Obama may not have any other choice but stroke that ego if he wants to regain lost popularity and win another term in office.

(end Shark Tank story by Javier Manjarres)

The "Bro"-mance continues?

See the Crist “Chronicles” on UNCOVERAGE.net:

Wimpinator Endorses the Crap Weasel

Desperate Democrats Pt 6: Charlie Crist the Crap Weasel

FL Senate Debate: Rubio Calls Out Crist as an “Opportunist”

Charlie Crist – Crap Weaseling Again

The Anti-Crist

FL. GOP Senate Race: Crist Needs to Resign: Policy and Character Counts